We all expected a last minute curveball and here it is. Management picking their ball up and taking it home on #4.
I’m sure this will be received well at the meeting today. Those in attendance MUST request the vote count on #4. What is there to hide?
Part
LikeLiked by 1 person
Only in regard to # 4, as I read it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Only in regard to # 4, as I read it. Others seem to be part of the meeting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
For some reason, I thought there would be an option to join by webcast today (as there was last year), but that is not the case. Many companies have turned to hybrid in-person/virtual annual meetings to be more inclusive of shareholder participation, but I guess that is too much to ask. Anyone who will be attending today, we look forward to any unfiltered observations you can share!
LikeLike
Meeting is still on – the way I interpret it is that they will only delay #4 if the votes that HK and SV cast determine that the proposal fails.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How much was spent on legal fees for the last battle?
LikeLiked by 1 person
That would be grand if they try and sue a board member over their vote. It would hasten the end of this current regime and bring back fiduciary responsibility
LikeLiked by 1 person
management continues to show themselves as complete scumbags , typical wall street
play book debase debase debase
LikeLiked by 1 person
seem like a positive sign to me. If they thought they could win outright, we would not see this action.
Barry must be norrising his pants about now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
At what point can we just go ahead and clean house? If there were to be a national search for the CEO of TPL we all know Ty wouldn’t even make the list.
LikeLiked by 1 person