I don’t know where the article gets its claim that it has “Shareholder friendly management” given what we’ve been through the last few years. We hope to start cleaning it up with this year’s annual meeting with Glover being shown the door along with the General and other original Board members who were/are not aligned with MS/EO.
I agree that any article written about TPL that does not at least mention the frosty past relations of shareholders vs. management quickly loses some credibility. Regarding this year’s election, I may be willing to keep Glover around due to an overall positive year (so far, let’s keep it going), but the other board members up for election still have a lot to answer to. I would like to hear each of them articulate what value they have added to TPL and why they were complicit with the plan to authorize more shares and waste millions to prosecute MS/EO over their refusal to vote for it. I doubt that we will every hear a word from any of them.
The Texas Pacific Land Trust Investor 
I don’t know where the article gets its claim that it has “Shareholder friendly management” given what we’ve been through the last few years. We hope to start cleaning it up with this year’s annual meeting with Glover being shown the door along with the General and other original Board members who were/are not aligned with MS/EO.
LikeLike
I agree that any article written about TPL that does not at least mention the frosty past relations of shareholders vs. management quickly loses some credibility. Regarding this year’s election, I may be willing to keep Glover around due to an overall positive year (so far, let’s keep it going), but the other board members up for election still have a lot to answer to. I would like to hear each of them articulate what value they have added to TPL and why they were complicit with the plan to authorize more shares and waste millions to prosecute MS/EO over their refusal to vote for it. I doubt that we will every hear a word from any of them.
LikeLike