3 thoughts on “Appeal Briefs

  1. I bought my first shares of TPL in 2017 on a tip from my Brother In-law. I thought he had shared greatest secret in the world with me. A company this rich in history and success, the perfect operating model and unlimited resource to last throughout my lifetime. Then I found the online community and found a passionate intelligent group of investors sharing information and excitement for the future. Talking about pipelines being built and EPS growth and new water business…. I loved it. Then it all fell into some dark abyss of legal battles and backroom dealing, and a stock that can’t get out of it’s own way. I held strong for a long time… but I’ve grown tired of watching this stock slowly drift downward while other opportunities pass me bye. I began unwinding my position a few months ago and today, sadly, sold my last shares.

    I want to thank this community and wish you all the best of luck in the battle. I also want to thank TPL Blogger for putting this all together, I’ve been positing here since day one and appreciate all the knowledge and laughs.

    GLTA… BDawg, out!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Not sure if this has previously been discussed on here…. But in reading, something caught my eye. On page 61 of the Appellants’ Corrected Opening Brief regarding the hand-written notes….

    “Barry is a bed guy on a personal level this Harvard law grad he wrote up contract for Jamie Diamond so near the big money but never makes big money but he may give tresspas – next line is Sidra and Manti Parker two law firms employ him. He may negotiate negotiating a deal for an oil company low rates to use the road or pipeline.” It also goes on to say that stuff about the Wise Oil”…. Was this meant to say he is a bad guy?

    Is this possibly stating that Barry works for another oil and gas company where he gets TPL to pay them lower rates on pipeline/easement/road access? As in, he gives the company he’s working at a favorable deal that wouldn’t be in the best interest of the share holders? If that is the case, could this be related to the resignation? At the least, it smells fishy….

    It also goes onto to talk about how the free water deal then quit and then joined the water and somehow Glover engineered “thar”….. It reminded me of this from a long time ago: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/investor-group-issues-questions-to-the-trustees-of-texas-pacific-land-trust-300852455.html

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.